jjgallow

Who was saying that? about no D in the top 10 https://www.tsn.ca/nhl/draftcentre/craig-s-list-after-impressive-u18-showing-axel-sandin-pellikka-moves-into-top-5-1.1960662 https://www.tsn.ca/intrigue-and-excitement-in-the-year-of-connor-bedard-at-the-nhl-draft-1.1976262 At least one of the buttons thought there was. but...don't get me wrong, your point is valid. The discrepancies are beyond wild lol. I was...shocked...to see the Flames pass in the D department. I'm not a Button fan, but I suspect he got it right with Pellika.

very tough call. a lot of them need d badly due to their history of short term decision making. traditionally, d are the ones that drop. i still think Tij, as much as I would like him, may be a moot point because someone will pick him over an incredibly good defenceman. We just have to know who that defenceman is. Because not all 6 of them will end up being difference makers.

yeah that's fair, it's just a salary question. he was the "unless we want to start eating salaries" bit for me. he good.

Mr. Andersson is sort of our last big play. Outside of things like Coronato, Honzek, Wolf. I'm not too excited about trading Wolf. But I would trade Coronato or Honzek, for future equivalent picks or better. Or as part of a package for a top, top D prospect. Of the vets we have, yeah it's kind of Andersson and that's it, unless we want to get into eating salary.

that was all pre-trade deadline though. We knew the spike in Markstrom's performance wouldn't last, and it didn't. He would need to have another year like that, and we'd have to wait until trade deadline, for him to have that value again and even then it would be very hard with him a year older. But hey, there have been crazier trades, never ruling anything out. But it's a bit astonishing that we didn't take it. One thing I did realize after: It probably actually helped our first pick placement, keeping him.

they won't do it because good organizations would win all the cups and bad organizations would spend decades in the basement. or at least that would be the fear. Meeting halfway would be nice though.

I wonder if there might be some salvageable staff. I mean I still prefer poaching detroit but sometimes you gotta mix it up

You remember me in the last draft. Wanted the D. You defending Honzek. Draft before that too. I'm still like that, but I think we should be picky. With the D available, should be able to get someone who has it all. Or Tij, but Then acquire a D to make up for it. You just wanna fight. I been there. Try taking the wife away for a few nights. Just sayin. In a redraft right now Seider would be unchanged. But some fell behind him, some have surpassed him. The ones who surpassed him did it with talent, and yes they can score, and there will be more of them by the time we do a 10 year redraft. He has a ceiling. I want to draft someone who doesn't. Don't get me wrong, I like Detroit. I hope they contend. They did most things right. Maybe not all

You would be surprised to know that in the NHL, it is possible to acquire players through trade, as well as free agent signing. I like Detroit and I like Seider and it's all just fine, but if that's the epitome of proving me wrong, you came up short. Seider is not yet a bonafide 1D on a great team. If he continues his development path then he could very well become that. Yes, I know he's got a good 2 way game. But it's still not quite enough. When people do the 10-year redraft, Seider's just not going to be on top of it, sorry. Or in the top 5. Lucky to be in top 10. Unless he's got another big development step coming, which he of course might, with his style of play. He's doing all the things defencemen finally learn to do as they hit their prime. And he's doing them early. But he doesn't necessarily have some of the other intangibles that the greats just...come with. There's just a few key things missing, and he could still learn them before he hits his prime, but they are HARD things to learn after the fact. D is a mess largely in part because the draft needs to be pushed back a year. It's too early to say if Seider is the best D in that draft. Ask yourself the best thing the Flames did with D in the last 20 years. Then load up on over-agers. I'll be happy if we draft a D, but to be completely honest I hope they are a little better than Seider if we do. He's very wholesome, I fully agree, but I'd still hope for a little more with a top 10 pick. Not that I'd mind him on he Flames, just saying.

there is only one GM in this league right now who would give a 1st for Markstrom. And that's the one. Fingers crossed.

thank God they didn't consider goal scoring and mess up by drafting Cozens.

my wife bought the tickets for that, because she's luckier ( for example, she found me )

that's the kind of pessimism we need!!!

if they hire a private investigator to spy on them, then yes.

Do it Conroy