Jump to content

conundrumed

SeniorMembers
  • Posts

    16,949
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    414

Everything posted by conundrumed

  1. This is getting super-old. When he drives to the net, it's almost always goalie interference that goes uncalled. Can we talk about that? https://www.tsn.ca/yost-the-connor-mcdavid-penalty-debate-continues-1.1762725
  2. To think they could've been Aho, Lindholm, Trochek down the middle. Yikes. They're 2nd to us in least goals allowed. No one else is really even very close.
  3. What's fun is most of you tossers didn't put us first. Just me and MP. Half didn't have us top 3, scoundrels.
  4. Oh. And I still tip my hat to Torts. He's the guy that believed in what this will be right up front. Here we are.
  5. Can't help but agree. We aren't afraid of anyone. Let's go, set of 7, we're not intimidated. You might want to be, we're not. This should be a lot of fun.
  6. Am I the only one afraid of no one? Avs, Fla, TBay, Carolina. I'm not the slightest bit afraid of those teams. Let's get on with it.
  7. Frustrate them, play pond hockey. Isn't that TMLs?
  8. It really does. I can't wait for this Minny set. Minny's solid, let's throw down with them. I think they're trying to be us. tbh. I hope we leave neither game uncertain. Should be a great 2 game set.
  9. I'll give this team a 10. Oh wait, they took the 10 anyways. I wanna give them an 11 soon.
  10. Honestly you only have to watch to see the difference. The past is the past. We were always capable of this but had a lot of fixing to do in the bottom 6 and D. They're playing a consistent hard-working game. That doesn't just fade away on a vet-laden team. Post game opponents coaches keep saying we're a good team and hard to play against. This is us now. Past years are past years. Different teams, different styles of play.
  11. Prediction time... When we clinch, Sutter will slowly turn the script to, "well everyone called us misfits, not a playoff team". And we will play the victim card. Everyone will love us.
  12. You don't have to match that way though. Sutter's mentioned a few times that "outscoring the opponent" is not a good longterm plan. So you don't have to have an offset, you need a good mitigation plan. So Backlund should be facing those guys. Backlund plays the Zetterberg role of stick to them like glue. That'll be Backlund's bread and butter for us. He's very underrated as a D specialist. Mony's D game has improved, Ruzicka gaining his comfort level. It's all about defending. So in Vegas, you'd try to get Eichel away from Backlund. You don't want it to be much of a fall off from line-to-line. As I see lots of line rearranging suggestions to increase scoring, I think it's more about consistent lines defensively. Building from the net out isn't about buying a goalie and defence first, it's structuring a net-out style of play. D first, we'll figure out offence later. It's working, and Sutter's still trying his best to keep everything low key.
  13. What happened to the Unicorns when you were loading the ark?
  14. Can't believe it took me 10 seconds to stream the feed.
  15. SNW restricted. Go figure. They are so dumb beyond words with these silly strategies.
  16. Yup. Great stuff here too rd: https://www.theplayerstribune.com/sports/hockey
  17. Maybe oddly, but my first thought was, "Right on, a 9pm start for rd". lol
  18. I definitely wouldn't consider there's any disconnect between the big club and the farm. I'm sure Sutter is very in tune with what he has in Stockton. I'd like to see some looks too, but Sutter is no dummy, so I can live with any direction. Detroit is a good example of being patient with prospects. Seider could have made the team last year, but why give him 3rd pairing minutes when he can keep building in the SHL? Yzerman wasn't even sure this year, but Seider kicked the door down. Imo it's beneficial that we let the farm be the farm for a year. We can use it next year. Lots of jr graduates for next year too. You want a fiercely competitive farm and we're definitely getting it to where it needs to be.
  19. I'll argue this to the death. How do you pull negatives out of a 9 game win streak? A team that was in question for the home record, the talent level, the weak D, the suspect goaltending, the zero depth? No identity, not good enough. *panting* This is a good hockey team. Call it what it is.
×
×
  • Create New...