Jump to content

travel_dude

Moderators
  • Posts

    52,168
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    104

Everything posted by travel_dude

  1. I would prefer Ghost to Zaitsev. That's not saying a ton.
  2. COL has big cap problems. I would love to snag Nich, but his last two years he showed as being a bit of a douchebad. I'm not sold that it's all on him but there are some signs. Wouldn't do Kadri for it though. Lose a top C for a winger.
  3. This is an odd year for our picks. The only way we keep the pick away from MTL is if it's top 10 and FLA is not. We place in or just outside the playoffs, they get the better of our and FLA picks. We may be a basement team this year, but two in a row is not how we roll.
  4. Jack Campbell signed in DET. There's your first dumb signing. Just kidding. It might be a great environment for him. And it's the league minimum. Gets paid to play in DET by EDM.
  5. Was a pretty slim crop of C. Wasn't really interested in anyine over 31. I think we have to weed out a bit perhaps. Figure out what kind of team we want to be.
  6. I wonder if the Lombo signing means that Rooney is on his way out. You could have Pospisil as 4C, since they believe he could play C. Then you have options on wing like Pelletier, Lombo, Klapka.
  7. Wasn't he suspended from the league? For the Player Assistance debacle.
  8. Kylington was not close in the offer from either side, so they may, as they say, circle back. Lombo is another of the heart guys like Coleman. Doesn't just play a shift. I don't want him out there fighting, but he will take on anything. I don't think he's taking away a deserving kid's spot. He will fire them up and maybe we lose a boring, less committed player. Sharky was already playing C and they wanted Zary at C. The opportunity was not really there until after season was toast. The coach suggested that it's very tough to be a rookie C in the league. Let's take a breath and see what lines and this roster looks by camp. It may not be close to done. And it's not really win now, just compete now.
  9. I don't mind the player. Energy guy, perfect 4th liner. Not like a Hathaway term WAS signed. Speaking of WAS, they have PLD and Strome. Send us Strome for a song. We take maybe a crap deal with it. TVR or Sandin.
  10. I think it's rather funny that VAN took a huge swing at Lindholm and gave away a ton, and essentially did it to get Debrusk, while BOS sat in the weeds and only let Debrusk go, escaping a huge overpay.
  11. I would take a prospect or maybe a guy sitting as a RFA. To your point, I think Connie is looking at the fools and waiting to call.
  12. Wonder how EDM fills up a roster with chump change remaining. Couple RFA's are manageable this year, but the other 4F and 1D add up.
  13. So ends the Bear trade tree.
  14. Reminds me a bit of the Rooney signing at the time. Dollar and term. Stuck with dead cap if they send him to the AHL.
  15. As I said, mixed it up with CHI.
  16. I may have been mixing it up with CHI. Some teams are opening up the safe.
  17. Name brand only real reason. I think they may have even looked at him when a trade was the likely conclusion.
  18. Myself I think they are winding down his use. He was a good trooper and I think they played him because they felt they owed it to him.
  19. I'm sure there will be contenders for it. The deals that DET and OTT are signing.....
  20. I think I would be using Mantha with Huberdeau. Kuz with Kadri and Zary. Pospisil with Backlund if you want to have a kids line.
  21. Good signing for term, just can never figure out how they manage the cap. Holland was bad, but he always managed to stay within it. I'm not sure how Brown's bonus fits in, but it's not cheap. Add to that the dead cap for couple buyouts. Last year of the Neal anchor. They need to get creative.
  22. Probably, but they have that Russian guy whose name I can never remember.
  23. It's insane if you take into account the wear and tear on him. It's insane that he would get a long term deal. What is not insane is the $5M AAV. Lots of lesser players get more and wingers do frequently. I wouldn't do it because we don't need a C that doesn't drive play.
  24. That's an odd one, considering what they paid to get him.
  25. Yes, the old "value" props. In some ways we got the best player when available, with some arguments from the expert scouts. I like what we did, just was hoping to get a top C. Maybe we have a real sleeper there that will blow the doors off, but generally we are not likely getting better than a Sharky at C. That's still high praise, but not the elusive #1, which of course is not available at any spot we looked.
×
×
  • Create New...