Gesus Posted July 2, 2008 Report Share Posted July 2, 2008 I was afraid of being beat again, so I just posted it in that old Dan Ryder thread in the affiliates forum. Looks like I would've been. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flamesbrain Posted July 2, 2008 Report Share Posted July 2, 2008 Can we develop him to the point of being marketable to trade him away to recover the 2nd or 3rd round picks that we are down for next year? Boston maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuel_the_Flames Posted July 2, 2008 Report Share Posted July 2, 2008 Thats good to hear. If he develops, our youth/future prospects dont look too bad. Nemisz Backlund Boyd Ryder Wahl Negrin Pelech Irving Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_People1 Posted July 2, 2008 Report Share Posted July 2, 2008 Good to hear he's back. Sutter joked about it on Fan960 saying something like, "hopefully his brother's new contract can get Dan back on track again." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irock19 Posted July 4, 2008 Report Share Posted July 4, 2008 Can we develop him to the point of being marketable to trade him away to recover the 2nd or 3rd round picks that we are down for next year? Boston maybe?Why does sutter continue to trade away 2nd round picks evey year and then he will trade down in the first round to get a second rounder. The higher the pick in the first round is normaly a better player.Calgary scouting staff is the Gary Leemans anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lombardi Posted July 4, 2008 Report Share Posted July 4, 2008 we do trade 2nd rounders too often: Conroy trade Kiprusoff Trade Hale trade (i think) Bourque Trade Cammalleri trade (albeit an exchange) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murray1 Posted July 4, 2008 Report Share Posted July 4, 2008 He also said that Prust would have to have a brutal camp not to make the Flames this year. Great The moment he starts taking stupid penalties I hope he is benched. One thing we cannot have like last year is retarded penalties. Something Prust, Conroy, Sarich and Phaneuf all bring to the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuel_the_Flames Posted July 4, 2008 Report Share Posted July 4, 2008 we do trade 2nd rounders too often: Conroy trade Kiprusoff Trade Hale trade (i think) Bourque Trade Cammalleri trade (albeit an exchange) Hale was a 3rd rounder. We did trade 2 more 2nd's with Leopold to acquire Tanguay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dajazz Posted July 4, 2008 Report Share Posted July 4, 2008 So this Ryder, how good is/can he be? Can't say I'm very up to date on the string of events that have led to the current situation, so if anyone would like to fill me in I would be grateful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cross16 Posted July 4, 2008 Report Share Posted July 4, 2008 Why does sutter continue to trade away 2nd round picks evey year and then he will trade down in the first round to get a second rounder. The higher the pick in the first round is normaly a better player.Calgary scouting staff is the Gary Leemans anyways. Pelech, Boyd, Moss, Prust, Parody, Aulie, Negrin, Backlund, Phaneuf, McE, etc are all either very close or NHL bound. Many of them were not first round picks. Other than Chucko, sutter's had good success in the first round. Of course I left out Irving who is considered to be one of the top 5 or so goalie prospects not in the NHL. And those 2nd also turned into Kipper, Tanguay, and Nilson. Nilson deosnt' sound liek much but you likely don't get a big cup run without Nilson. That line was instrumental. Other than the Conroy trade, Sutter has got good return in trading his 2nd rounders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lanny4mayor Posted July 4, 2008 Report Share Posted July 4, 2008 Pelech, Boyd, Moss, Prust, Parody, Aulie, Negrin, Backlund, Phaneuf, McE, etc are all either very close or NHL bound. Many of them were not first round picks. Other than Chucko, sutter's had good success in the first round. Of course I left out Irving who is considered to be one of the top 5 or so goalie prospects not in the NHL. And those 2nd also turned into Kipper, Tanguay, and Nilson. Nilson deosnt' sound liek much but you likely don't get a big cup run without Nilson. That line was instrumental. Other than the Conroy trade, Sutter has got good return in trading his 2nd rounders. I would even say include the Conroy trade as well. On ice, his offensive game has slipped a bit but his defensive skills and faceoffs are still solid (I did not say great--just solid). He takes over Yelle's position nicely. And, the intangibles of his, such as his like-ability, desire to be here, friendship with Iggy (and everyone else), and great sound bites mean a great deal as well. Back on topic of Dan Ryder...I hope he gets his Gary Leeman together and finds his desire to play. He could be a solid prospect for us in the near future. It's always a shame when you hear of someone with all the talent but no heart. I hope that is no longer the case with Ryder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuel_the_Flames Posted July 5, 2008 Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 Good to hear he's back. Sutter joked about it on Fan960 saying something like, "hopefully his brother's new contract can get Dan back on track again." That is a great quote. If Michael's deal cant motivate him.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonesin Posted July 5, 2008 Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 So this Ryder, how good is/can he be? Can't say I'm very up to date on the string of events that have led to the current situation, so if anyone would like to fill me in I would be grateful. Ryder was looking to be possibly better than his brother, he had loads of talent, and then he decided to take some time off from hockey. It's somewhat of a mystery why, but it's good to hear that he's back. If he picks up where he left off, I could see him making the team, not this year, but next. http://www.hockeysfuture.com/prospects/daniel_ryder''>http://www.hockeysfuture.com/prospects/daniel_ryder' target="_blank">http://www.hockeysfuture.com/prospects/daniel_ryder[/post] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terence_fong Posted July 5, 2008 Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 Hockey Future prospect reports are always so outdated... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kristian_Huselius Posted July 5, 2008 Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 Its pretty unfair to lay blame to the scouting, especially on Sutter. Man Zetterberg was a rookie in like 03/04 it take 4 or 5 years sometimes for a prospect to develop. Not every player can jump straight into the fire and make a difference. Personally so far Sutter has done a way better job resurrecting our scouting/drafting/developing than previous management has. Its the way of the future, and Sutter has seemingly bought into that idea. In 2 years, or possibly this year as trial by fire, you will see Sutter's draftees finally start to make a difference and tell the real tale of the Sutter dynasty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_People1 Posted July 5, 2008 Report Share Posted July 5, 2008 My biggest concern with Dan Ryder is his physical conditioning. Was he constantly on the bikes and treadmills during his down time? Did he stay in shape? Has he developed more strength and muscles? I have a feeling he's going to have to start things over again from the beginning and is now a full year or two away from being NHL ready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
memphusky Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 Great The moment he starts taking stupid penalties I hope he is benched. One thing we cannot have like last year is retarded penalties. Something Prust, Conroy, Sarich and Phaneuf all bring to the game. wow, that sounds like pouting to me. Penalties are part of the game, live with it. Its pretty unfair to lay blame to the scouting, especially on Sutter. Man Zetterberg was a rookie in like 03/04 it take 4 or 5 years sometimes for a prospect to develop. Not every player can jump straight into the fire and make a difference. Personally so far Sutter has done a way better job resurrecting our scouting/drafting/developing than previous management has. Its the way of the future, and Sutter has seemingly bought into that idea. In 2 years, or possibly this year as trial by fire, you will see Sutter's draftees finally start to make a difference and tell the real tale of the Sutter dynasty. Absolutely correct sir. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuel_the_Flames Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 Interesting interview with Sutter on Fan960, he mentioned that Ryder is coming back to development camp. He also said that Prust would have to have a brutal camp not to make the Flames this year. When does the Development camp start? Is it this month? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IggytoTanguay Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 we do trade 2nd rounders too often: Conroy trade Kiprusoff Trade Hale trade (i think) Bourque Trade Cammalleri trade (albeit an exchange) Terrible trade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cross16 Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 When does the Development camp start? Is it this month? Its usually in late July or very early August. I've heard July from Sutter and Kerr but no firm dates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flamesbrain Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 Its usually in late July or very early August. I've heard July from Sutter and Kerr but no firm dates. I thought it was July 20th to 27th. I have no way to verify that though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funnymunk77 Posted July 15, 2008 Report Share Posted July 15, 2008 It starts on July 21st. Says so on the homepage of the site. Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kristian_Huselius Posted July 24, 2008 Report Share Posted July 24, 2008 Just watching Sportsnet they interviewed Dan. He said he was glad to be back and see his friends. He also claimed to be working hard at a roster spot. The announcer said he was looking good on the ice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CGY_07 Posted August 14, 2008 Report Share Posted August 14, 2008 Just watching Sportsnet they interviewed Dan. He said he was glad to be back and see his friends. He also claimed to be working hard at a roster spot. The announcer said he was looking good on the ice. good now maybe we can trade his a$$. if hundreds of thousands of dollars can't motivate him to play when hes young nothing will ever motivate him period, he will be lazy like his brother but with less talent, he will never put up big numbers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlamesFanatic Posted August 14, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 14, 2008 good now maybe we can trade his a$$. if hundreds of thousands of dollars can't motivate him to play when hes young nothing will ever motivate him period, he will be lazy like his brother but with less talent, he will never put up big numbers Do you have ANY clue WHY he stopped playing for a year? It wasn't matter of money, it was a matter of personal drive and being worn out from playing hockey almost 24/7. This kid played more hockey than alot of NHL players, and had worse travel conditions to boot. He played two full seasons of going far in the in playoffs and just needed time off from hockey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.