conundrumed
-
Posts
16,363 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
374
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Videos
Events
Gallery
Everything posted by conundrumed
-
It's likely time we just give it up for our tandem. Get behind what we've got, rather than look into the crystal ball for judgement. It's working, let's run with it until it isn't. It's still a great problem to have.
-
Hiller's had great rest, let's see him rock it against the Wings. We have a tandem. Both hot would be epic!
-
They're selling you wooden nickels. Waive Ortio right now? Sure he'd be gone, waive him from camp, the market is flooded with guys waived out of camp. Do you see gm's actively plucking the waiver wire out of camp? No, you don't. Is it possible, out of camp? Sure. But it will be a lowlife GM, like Kevin Lowe. There aren't many of those...
-
Yep. But same as all year, some really good defence from our 'tending. A lot is on them to keep us in rarified air. It's possible, but we should be worried about offence more than d. 1 goal in 3 games is not cool, no matter how you slice it.
-
Thanks cross, that is the thought rolling around my pea brain lol. These optics happen often. The Brent Sutter thing, we trade down our #1 with NJ to appease Lou. Feaster leaves Chiarelli with egg on his face, Burke fires Feaster when Boston comes to Calgary. That's just our "coincidences". I may be wrong, but clearing waivers for guys you want to keep is a dilemma for all. If you want to be the GM that plucks from other teams, get ready to be handcuffed with your own moves. So I view it as a risk to waive, certainly, but there is likely calculation behind the risk. So sometimes you see guys clear waivers and wonder why, I believe there is more there than simply claiming anyone off of waivers.
-
A level of respect and comaraderie.
-
Okay, am I the only guy that believes there's GM collusion in this league? "Screw me over, 8 of us will make you pay". Is that a "just me" thing?
-
yup. Goal is kind of an important position, teams tend to already have their prospects!
-
From the hockey writers:
-
Trading Glencross smells like seller to me also.
-
Pretty sure we're on the same page. We can only solidify our G further to give us more options and even better returns. There's a possibility Gillies is in camp next year also. A few short months ago, this was a good problem to have! It's still a good problem to have. Perhaps Gillies becomes the IR callup and Ortio can sail fair in the A another year. Lock up Ramo for 3 more, Hiller becomes next year's deadline fodder, and we hopefully have great depth at the position to bargain with. Ramo has earned the contract, I agree the optics in our group are going to suck if he's allowed to walk. Particularly if we play a "not interested in signing you again" card. Karma's tough, you've gotta reward your top players, our tandem has earned it. While the media has feasted on Gio, Brodie and Johnny/Mona/Huds, even Bouma, the under-lying story, methinks, is our tandem.
-
Probably a good time to discuss our cap floor issues. Is having 3 goalies on 1 ways something that might be beneficial? Particularly with all of the Glencross trade talk?
-
I appreciate that from yourself and robrob. I think I needed it actually! Sorry kehatch, I wasn't meaning to be a grunt about it, but we're where we shouldn't be. Reading "ah Hiller this, ah Ramo that" really strikes a nerve in me. Especially the "whose gotta go?". It isn't the time to have that discussion imho. So I apologize if I came across very narrow-minded.
-
You got me. I give up. Let's keep the focus on which of these 2 needs to go. Seems like a good thing to stir up controversy about. I know media doesn't thrive on that. Our goalies brought it to the table this year. Heck, we're looking very unpredictable in my homer eyes. Again, and I can't stress this enough, I live in the now. And right now, we have a terrific tandem. In the off season, we have some hard decisions. It's where it's at. I love our tandem, piss off with the drama.
-
So we'll lose him for nothing? Is that the problem? He's helping us, does that matter?
-
Wow you guys. What is your team doing right now? Why stress until the season comes to pass? Kind of a ridiculous argument before we know what transpires THIS season. We're kind of doing okay, from any vantage point. Why harp the negatives out of which goalie should go, I guess is my point. At this point, neither. Stop trading them. IMHO, of course.
-
I might have been username carbuncle then, or crash even earlier. Yeah, I know. The point I'd stress is, "live in the now". Right now we have a tandem that I've had zero to complain about all year. They are very different goalies, they both can ride some pretty high attributes when they are on. We don't really look like a team on paper that should be where we're at. I don't understand, at this point in the season, why all we can think to do is sit around and complain. "We can't lose Ramo for nothing" is my favourite NHL calamity. The only time you lose a player for nothing is when he has a career ending injury. People shouldn't fret over next season, there's an off-season. Imagine how Cup threats feel, are they all caught up in next season? No, because we have THIS season to finish. And anything goes...
- 13,115 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- goalies
- goaltending
- (and 2 more)
-
Back on the topic of our current goaltending, I think it's quite good. And find it a little distasteful to even consider whom we should out at this point. All year, the backstopping has been solid, be it Hiller, Ramo or Ortio's brief stint. It's a point of power for us, why not just enjoy the ride? Ramo was awfully good at this point last year. Just sayin'....
- 13,115 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- goalies
- goaltending
- (and 2 more)
-
And I wasn't. Just to clarify, I was responding to Zirak about Hiller's misfortunes in Anaheim last season. I didn't discuss Ramo because he wasn't the subject. But if you'd like my opinion on Ramo, I believe he follows the puck well in traffic, has good reflexes, but scrambles too much. I don't believe there's a huge difference between Hiller and Ramo in quality, but I believe their styles are a lot different. My preference for us is Hiller, because he stays in the net to a fault. But having said that, I like our tandem, and there has been more than one occasion I'd have gone with Ramo myself. It doesn't mean the result would have changed, just how I view aesthetics from team to team in styles of play expected. I'm in no rush to move either goalie currently. But let's say in the next 2, I'd go Hiller vs NYR and Ramo vs NYI, for example. The reasoning is style of play expected.
-
I'm more of the mind that Bruce Boudreau made poor decisions with his goaltending last year. With some of the stacked teams he's had in Washington and now Anaheim, you have to start wondering if he's much of a coach in the playoffs. Everyone knows putting the bulk of what is wrong on your goalies shoulders is just whitewashing other issues, such as being continually out-coached in line-matching. They made Hiller unwelcomed likely a year too soon at least. But it was no secret Hiller didn't want to sign in Anaheim. No point pretending Hiller screwed up, Anaheim did. We're just the beneficiaries. But it's painful to see Hiller just fine back there for 5 out of 6, and get hacked to bits when the team plays like crap, as they did with the Ducks. Forget pretending what happened in Anaheim was all Hiller not being worth anything, it's simply not true, and we aren't Anaheim, and we're not coached by Boudreau.
-
What? Typical Flames fan, 1 night of misfortune, "that's it, you're a bum". Go cheer for your glorious Pens, boarding off.
- 13,115 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- goalies
- goaltending
- (and 2 more)
-
How awesome was our D in '04? Juss sayin'.
-
I'll call bollocks. You don't know what it takes. Neither do I nor does anyone else. There isn't a formula, so we might just as well sit on our crowns and not start handing out pamphlets pretending we actualy know, especially the one's doused in negatives. They've already surprised, I wouldn't jump to say they're out of surprises.
-
It's all for not now as it looks like Hiller's start. I'd still go Ramo myself, you can't baby this stuff imo. Be it the Pens, Blues or Preds, you can't be afraid to give either of your goalies a hard start, even under hard circumstances. Hiller has been stalwart, but the only thing it earns him is trust and belief in him. Each win shouldn't be a guaranteed next start. If we get crushed he doesn't get the next start. Call it semantics, but I wouldn't manage goalies like that. Call it "reward", but it's pretty disingenuous. As soon as he loses that 4-1 one, he loses his next start. You start creating a backfire that your losses are on the goalie. Also that you burned up your goalies focus when he's playing well, rather than managed it. Being that it's below my post, was this directed at me? Just seeking clarification, as you didn't quote anyone.
-
You know when you have to scroll down to find this thread that goaltending isn't an issue for now. Nothing to say if we aren't complaining lol. To the point, I'd like to see Ramo in vs the Pens. Riding the hot hand is a myth, imho. Hiller was afforded massive rest by Ortio, he's on form. Keep him there knowing he isn't a camel. Ramo HAS to get some starts, both of our goalies need to be on form, Hiller earns his days off. Doing it against the Pens will send more fear into everyone lol.
- 13,115 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- goalies
- goaltending
- (and 2 more)
