So, each year we see a change in the coaching.
BH - had success by letting the kids take the car out, wreck it or return it safely. Next year, it was all about proving he was a great coach and changed the mindset to hold players accountable and yell at them when they made mistakes.
Gully - let the team decide how to play until he starts throwing sticks. The team takes it upon themselves to hold player only meeting to change their approach. squeaked in and lost in round 1. Dropped next year,
BP - hard-nosed coach that got results until the playoff. Lost in round 1. 2nd year was a bad start after adjusting to the playoff loss. Wardo got them back into it enough to qualify the play-in series. Lost dreadfully to the Stars.
Wardo - followed up a bad year with a year that we would not make the playoffs.
Sutter - okay finish to the takeover year. Full year was a good run and the playoffs a letdown. Overplayed Markstrom to the point where he had little left in the tank for the playoffs. Questionable decisions in round 2. Use of 4th line against a fast team, when he had last change. This year a repeat of the Markstrom starts, more questionable use of players.
My point is that each coach here had a life of one year at most. Year two of a coach should not end up being much worse results. Build in the success not downgrade the play. Clean up the areas that haunted us. Not make the rest of it worse. The players are accountable, but how much can you blame top players playing with 4th liners. Or being forced to play with guys that don't match.
The latest change was to play your (former) top offensive star with your shutdown pair (Backs/Coleman). That's after most of the year playing on the wrong wing. Put Pelletier up with the top line and expect him to help carry it. Run a goalie for 10 games that was clearly showing some bad things for come of those games. The Dallas game should have been a wakeup. Even the ANA game was a team badly outshot scoring on 18 shots.